Postscripts on Gilad Shalit

Postscripts on Gilad Shalit

A school-age chum of Gilad Shalit is actually living in my home right now. Lior is the nephew by marriage of an Israeli cousin of mine.

Gilad Shalit (photo released by IDF)

Lior describes Shalit as shy and a bit of an oddball, who “hung out” with Lior’s circle of friends, a year or two older than he.  When rumors would fly of efforts to free Gilad, Lior would discuss these with friends & family via Skype.  

There’s a lot more that can be said on this, of course. For example, the diverse reasons that so many Palestinians have been imprisoned, some justly and others not: from participating in heinous mass murders to offenses that should not be cause for  imprisonment, e.g., merely being a member of Hamas. (This NY Times article is about the serious crimes committed by some of the freed Palestinian prisoners.)

And there has to be the disappointment that some of us feel for the fact that Marwan Barghouti, the militant Fatah leader convicted for organizing terror attacks, is apparently excluded from the list of prisoners to be exchanged.  His imprisonment is not without reason: he was the leader of the Tanzim militia that morphed into the Al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades, which competed with Hamas and Islamic Jihad to commit murderous attacks on random Israelis, even within Israel’s Green Line borders.  But he is also thought of by many (including leaders of the Meretz party who have known him for years) as a plausible successor to Mahmoud Abbas and a credible partner for peace with Israel.  That a convicted murderer should be thought of as being a “moderate” is maddening, but this surely reflects the crazy reality that Israel inhabits.

Finally, here (courtesy of Lilly Rivlin) is a link to the Jerusalem Post article by Gershom Baskin, the tireless Israeli peace activist, on his role in securing Shalit’s release.

By | 2011-10-19T14:06:00-04:00 October 19th, 2011|Blog|1 Comment

One Comment

  1. Werner Cohn November 5, 2011 at 6:35 pm - Reply

    The author suggests that Arab youngsters are regularly imprisoned, “unjustly,” for such minor causes as stone throwing. In other words, the Israeli penal system does not meet the author’s enlightened and progresssive requirements for justice.

    1) Stone throwing generally involves an intention of causing bodily harm, or, at the very least, a reckless disregard for human life. Such offenses are rightfully considered to be very serious in all just societies.

    2) It turns out that the Israeli justice system, if we are to believe the very source to which the author links, is in fact very lenient in such cases:

    (start quote)
    “Seven thousand Palestinian children have been detained, interrogated and prosecuted and imprisoned in the Israeli military system over the past ten years,” Catherine Weibel, a spokeswoman for UNICEF said in a phone interview today.

    Weibel said that 35 of the detained minors are between the ages of 12 and 15 but that most are 16 or 17 years of age. Under Israeli law, minors over the age of 14 can be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison for throwing a stone at an individual, and up to 20 years for hurling it at a moving vehicle. In practice, Israeli military courts rarely sentence minors to more than 2 months, and typically hold them for a period of a couple of weeks to about 3 months. Children under the age of 12 are released from custody without being charged.
    (end quote)

    So the author has turned the “rarely .. more than two months” of his own source to a “lengthy imprisonment” in this self-righteous, ignorant, hostile rant against the Israeli system of justice.

Leave A Comment